TECHNOLOGY

MIT nanotech makes plant genetic engineering “universal”

MIT researchers have developed a genetic tool that uses nanotechnology to improve plant genetic engineering in a bid to improve resistance to tough conditions, such as drought or fungal infections. Robert Scammell investigates.

The nanotech genetic modification technique developed by the team at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) is applicable across all plant species, with researchers testing it in spinach, watercress, tobacco, arugula and Arabidopsis thaliana – a type of plant commonly used in research. Current genetic modifications need to be customised to the specific plant species. This can make it a complex and time-consuming process.
“This is a universal mechanism that works across plant species,” said Michael Strano, the Carbon P. Dubbs Professor of Chemical Engineering at MIT.

How does the plant genetic engineering work?

To get the genetically modifying nanoparticles into plant membranes, researchers built upon previous research by Strano and his colleagues. In a method known as lipid exchange envelope penetration, or LEEP, scientists adjusted the size of nanoparticle’s electrical charge.


The goal of the latest research was to get genes into chloroplasts, the site at which photosynthesis takes place. The chloroplast contains around 80 genes that code for proteins required to perform photosynthesis.

47% of the plant cells produced the added protein, although the researchers believe this figure could be higher

With the new method, the MIT team created nanoparticles consisting of carbon nanotubes wrapped in a naturally occurring sugar known as chitosan. Because the nanotubes are positively charged and DNA is negatively charged, the two bind loosely together. Once bound, the DNA – containing the plant modification – is then injected into the plant using a needleless syringe.


Inside the leaf of the plant, the nanoparticles pass through the cell wall, cell membranes and then the double membrane of the chloroplast. Here the slightly less acidic environment of the chloroplast causes the DNA to be freed from the nanoparticle, where it is then translated into proteins that modify the plant.


Researchers tested this with a yellow fluorescent protein so that the success of the modification was easily visible. They found that 47% of the plant cells produced the added protein, although they believe this figure could be higher if they could add more nanoparticles.

Resilient plants

The ultimate aim of plant genetic engineering is to increase crop yields, a goal that becomes increasingly important as the population grows and climate change makes growing conditions more challenging.


Notably, while the engineered genes can be passed to offspring, they cannot be transferred to other plant species. This eliminates the risk of a weed adopting genetically modified traits such as higher density or resilience.


“That’s a big advantage, because if the pollen has a genetic modification, it can spread to weeds and you can make weeds that are resistant to herbicides and pesticides. Because the chloroplast is passed on maternally, it’s not passed through the pollen and there’s a higher level of gene containment,” said scientific director of the DiSTAP program, and MIT graduate student, Tedrick Thomas Salim Lew.


There is also the possibility that the technique can be extended to other types of nanomaterials.


The study was published in Nature Nanotechnology and funded by the National Research Foundation of Singapore and the Singapore-MIT Alliance for Research and Technology Center.


This article originally appeared on Verdict.co.uk

Share this article

Go to article: Home | The price of palm oilGo to article: In this issueGo to article: SolMic ResearchGo to article: SolMic Research - Company InsightGo to article: ContentsGo to article: RibusGo to article: NewsGo to article: Rosenqvists Food TechnologiesGo to article: The briefing on the latest food industry developmentsGo to article: Nutrition goes nano: the future of vitamin deliveryGo to article: JPL Flavour TechnologiesGo to article: JPL Flavour Technologies - Company insightGo to article: Can collagen live up to its youthful promise?Go to article: CBDepotGo to article: CBDepot - Company InsightGo to article: Edible insects: is eating creepy crawlies as sustainable as it seems?Go to article: VEGA AustraliaGo to article: Exploring edible insect market expansion with Eat GrubGo to article: PROVAGo to article: Palm oil: will food companies find a sustainable way forward?Go to article: InterfoodGo to article: Sweeteners: friend or foe of the food industry?Go to article: IPCOGo to article: iFarm: could vertical farming be the future of agriculture?Go to article: LipofoodsGo to article: Agriculture 4.0: Australia invests in future of farmingGo to article: GraminexGo to article: Stabilimento FarmaceuticoGo to article: MIT nanotech makes plant genetic engineering “universal”Go to article: System CleanersGo to article: Soja ProteinGo to article: Are meal replacement products the new convenience food?Go to article: EuromedGo to article: ProvitasGo to article: Taking the initiative: Achieving greater uptime and productivity with predictive maintenanceGo to article: IdconGo to article: Idcon - Company InsightGo to article: Event: Vitafoods Europe 2019Go to article: AlzChem TrostbergGo to article: EventsGo to article: Amma LifestyleGo to article: Daiichi JitsugyoGo to article: Next IssueGo to article: MagnattackGo to article: NorevoGo to article: FrieslandCampina IngredientsGo to article: FlexLinkGo to article: FaravelliGo to article: Faravelli - Company Insight